So, although I have much to get done in an incredibly small amount of time, my last two hours constructed these thoughts:
We need God because we’re not perfect. If we were perfect we would be able to save ourselves and wouldn’t need God. If we were perfect we wouldn’t need anyone else. If we didn’t need anyone else we would not need love for love calls us to take care of each other and that care would not be needed because there would be nothing we couldn’t do for ourselves. If we did not love each other we would avoid each other. If we avoided each other and did not love each other we would not create an environment necessary for procreation. Obviously with no such environment the human race would cease to exist. The only way we have gotten this far, then, is from not being perfect. If we are not perfect we must need help.
It has been suggested that, “Religion is… the opium of the people.” (Karl Marx). Such a phrase suggests to me that religion does not work to fix a problem; it only seeks to give the illusion that the problem is not there. It is the morphine to a broken leg. After reading the quote in context with the rest of the paragraph, I believe that Marx is, in short, suggesting that religion is seeking after hope in hopeless situations and if the situation did not exist the need for hope wouldn’t either. So, once again, if the world were perfect we wouldn’t need hope.
But I am yet to see evidence of this perfect world.
In many different ways it has been suggested that religion is simply a way to control people. If that were the case, as I consider Christianity, I figure whoever dreamed it up must have been quite intelligent. I say that because they discovered how to get the people to take care of themselves and while the controllers themselves remained on the sidelines. You see, Jesus’ command was to “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matt 22:37-39) Jesus told the people to love God. If Jesus and Christianity were a farce, those creating the farce wanted the people not to focus on them and instead look to a fictional character they created. Also, the ‘controllers’ would not have to bother themselves with caring for the people for Jesus commanded the people to love each other. Most would consider to this mean that we are called to look out for each other, help each other out and not fight.
Personally, I cannot see how those seeking to control the people through a farce would have much concern for the people themselves. In fact, it would seem to me that such ‘leaders’ were more interested in power and distracting the people so they could do as they pleased at the ‘top’. This is not to say that I think Christianity is a distraction (well, perhaps it is but it would be distraction me from seeking to live in selfish materialism). The thing that really does not line up for me is that if there were actually leaders who dreamed Christianity up so they could seek power they would have no love for the people, only themselves, yet created a farce based purely on loving others. They also created one where the people would not be looking to the government for answers but to a made up character that they then placed in the hands of the people and cease to have control over. How does this make sense?
When push comes to shove, whether I am able to prove my faith or not, whether I get to the end of my life only to discover I had faith in a farce or not, my life is better for believing it. My sorrow is less deep for having hope. My love for others is richer and deeper. My passion for life is stronger. I do not simply behave because it has been suggested I will go to Heaven if I do but I desire to live well because I can see how life is better that way, how misbehaving has so much more to overcome and I want to help others to be able to live better as well.
Let me ask you this, if religion is simply the attempt to give the illusion that problems do not exist why do so many religions seek to better the world? Why do they seek to offer love and hope to others? Why do they work to feed the hungry and shelter the homeless? The church must be aware there are problems and are willing to face them or they would not be doing these things whether those bent on control are or not. William Temple said, “Church is only society on earth that exists for the benefit of non-members.”
Quite frankly, if it is true that my faith is based on something manifested by some greedy, power-seeking leaders who want to distract me while they play games of ‘who has the loudest voice’ and ‘who has the most toys’, that’s fine. It means that I don’t have to bother with them while I live a life focused on loving others. Let them have what they think is power. Let them live for their toys. I’d rather live and die for something far less petty.